For local and regional governments with a mandate to order and deploy ai systems, this site will generate your request for bid, with parameters for bias and citizen world models. The software development kit is publicly licensed so adding it to your architecture will be cheap and make future versions more robust.

Competitive bids return to your official email aligned with your preferred procurement vehicle, routed via authorized NASA SEWP V and ITES-SW2 contract holders.

Vendors shall separate pricing into standard CLIN structures, distinguishing base system licensing from continuous model drift management.

IN

Interstate

Solicit AI Bids

Registry status

Open

Cycle

FY 2026

Post a solicitation

Request for proposals · Custom AI systems

Solicit AI bids. Built for your municipality.

Reference AI initiatives from across the US and the world, define your municipality’s unique requirements, and open them to competitive bids from the leading American AI firms.

Begin a solicitation → See what you can solicit

Notice of Solicitation DRAFT

Docket reference

IN-2026-··–·····

InstrumentRFP — open bid

PostureImplementation-first

StandardsHarmonize forward

Issued by— pending —

Every solicitation generates an official NASA SEWP V, ITES-SW2 or NASPO ValuePoint form — to you and to the routing desk of the Master Government Aggregator, for competitive bids from their partners: Rhino.ai, Google Cloud, AWS, Sybal, Zenity, US AI, NVIDIA, and Hammerspace. Governance terms are selectable, auditable, and defensible. Bias Analysis and Neuro Symbolic World Model Participation are opt in features for some products.

3,611

Reported US federal AI use cases in 2025 — more than double the prior year. Local and state are next.

6

Jurisdictions benchmarked — US, EU, China, Japan, South Korea, Iran — to ground every category offered here.

~95min

Average daily time saved per worker in Pennsylvania’s enterprise AI pilot. Evidence, not promises.

50

States that introduced AI legislation in 2025. Build for harmonization, not against a moving target.

Solicitation categories

What a government body can put out to bid

Each category is drawn from AI systems already operating in government somewhere in the world — adapted for the scale and accountability of a county, city, or state agency.

CAT-01

Resident service assistants

Multilingual chat and voice systems for 311, permits, and benefits questions — answering residents in plain language, around the clock, with human handoff.

Service delivery

CAT-02

Proactive eligibility & benefits

Systems that pre-identify residents likely eligible for benefits, credits, or renewals and prompt a one-click confirmation — flipping government from reactive to proactive.

Benefits administration

CAT-03

Plain-language & translation

Auto-generation of plain-language and multilingual versions of every notice, ordinance, and letter at publication — with mandatory human review on high-stakes content.

Communications

CAT-04

Predictive infrastructure

Fusing sensor data, 311 reports, and weather to forecast water-main breaks, potholes, and bridge stress before failure — a digital nervous system for public works.

Operations

CAT-05

Document & records processing

Intelligent intake, classification, and summarization of permits, filings, and case files — clearing backlogs while keeping a person on every consequential decision.

Back office

CAT-06

Public-comment synthesis

Clustering thousands of public comments into themes, surfacing minority viewpoints, and producing an auditable synthesis council members can actually read.

Participation

CAT-07

Fraud & anomaly detection

Pattern detection for improper payments, benefit fraud, and procurement anomalies — flagging for human investigators rather than deciding on its own.

Integrity

CAT-08

Permitting & case workflow

Guided application intake, completeness checks, and routing that shortens permit and license cycles measured today in weeks down to days.

Workflow

CAT-09

Custom — define your own

A blank instrument. Describe the problem in your own terms and let vendors propose the system. The form below captures whatever you need built.

Open scope

The posture

Implementation now. Harmonization forward.

Procurement officers can’t wait for the regulatory debate to settle, and they can’t sign anything they couldn’t defend at a council meeting. Interstate threads that needle: solicit and build today, with governance terms written in as selectable, auditable features — designed to harmonize with standards as they mature rather than betting against them.

Principle 01

Governance is a feature, not a gate

Human-in-the-loop, audit logging, and data-residency terms are selectable line items in the solicitation itself — so the requirement is on the record before the first bid arrives.

Principle 02

Exit-ready by default

Solicitations can require open formats and no vendor lock-in — the one attribute every oversight memo now demands, and the easiest promise to break without it written down.

Principle 03

Forward-compatible with the rules

Frameworks differ across jurisdictions but converge on transparency and accountability. Build to that convergence and tomorrow’s standard is an update, not a rebuild.

Notice of solicitation · Open bid

Put your AI requirement out to bid

Complete the instrument below. It composes two formal emails — one to you, one to the routing desk — ready to forward to the leading American AI firms. Nothing is sent until you choose to send it.

§1Issuing body

Government body / agency *

Enter the issuing body.

Level of government * Select… County Municipal / City State agency Special district / authority Regional council / COG School district

Select a level.

State / territory * Select…

Select a state.

Population served optional — helps vendors size the bid

§2What you need built

Solicitation category * Select… Resident service assistants Proactive eligibility & benefits Plain-language & translation Predictive infrastructure Document & records processing Public-comment synthesis Fraud & anomaly detection Permitting & case workflow Custom — define your own

Choose a category.

Working title for the system *

Give the solicitation a title.

Problem statement *what’s broken or slow today

Describe the problem to be solved.

Desired outcome optional — what success looks like

§3Governance posture

Select the terms vendors must meet. These print into the notice as binding requirements — the defensible core of the solicitation.

Human-in-the-loopA person decides on every consequential action. Audit log & explainabilityEvery output traceable and reviewable. Exit-ready, no lock-inOpen formats; data portable on exit. Data residencyNo training on resident data; defined hosting. Bias & impact testingPre-deployment disparate-impact review. AccessibilitySection 508 + multilingual delivery.

§4Timeline & budget

Budget range optional Prefer not to state Under $50K — pilot $50K–$250K $250K–$1M $1M+ Seeking vendor estimate

Target go-live optional Flexible Within 90 days This fiscal year Next fiscal year Exploratory — no date

Bids close optional

Funding source optional

Procurement Vehicle preferred route Select vehicle (Optional) NASA SEWP V ITES-SW2 Open Market / Other

Require Local / On-Premise Hardware CLIN Force vendors to quote separate hardware costs for air-gapped or sensitive deployments.

§5Point of contact & routing

Name *

Enter a contact name.

Title optional

Your official email *your copy of the solicitation is sent here

Enter a valid email address.

Routing desk email forwards your bid to participating AI firms

Enter a valid routing email.

Compose solicitation emails → Composes the emails in your browser and opens your mail app to send. Nothing is transmitted until you hit send.

Solicitation emails — ready to send

Open email to you Open email to routing desk Copy both Download .txt New notice

This functional services exchange is part of a research project identifying biases and developing an open source neuro symbolic world model. Vendors will price the cost of integrating the bias tests and citizen neuro symbolic world model as line items in their quotes. The federal master aggregator requirements are complex. They are explained in this document:

IN

Interstate

Solicit AI Bids

Data brief · Government AI spend · 2025

Research · Choropleth series

Where government money meets AI, mapped against size.

Two views of 2025 government AI spending — one across US states, one across reporting countries — each normalized four ways so a small country’s focused budget isn’t drowned out by a large one’s raw total. Read the ratios, not the dollar piles.

READ FIRST

Government AI-spend reporting is inconsistent and rarely comparable. Figures mix procurement obligations, annual budgets, and multi-year mobilization targets. Every value here is tagged by confidence; estimates are hatched on the maps and asterisked in the tables. Multi-year private-inclusive targets (EU, France) are held out of the color scale so they don’t distort it. Treat this as a directional briefing, not an audited ledger.

Map 01 · United States

US states — the honest picture

Documented state-level AI appropriations barely exist yet. New York’s Empire AI is the one hard figure; two others are low-confidence estimates. The emptiness is the finding.

lowhigh

No comparable data

Estimate (low confidence)

Only 3 of 50 states have any documented figure. Hover a shaded state for detail.

US states with any documented or estimated 2025 AI figure · federal shown for scale

Entity	AI spend (2025)	GDP	Population	AI $/capita	AI/GDP	GDP per AI$	Pop per AI$	Conf.

Map 02 · International

Reporting countries — the cleaner story

Defaults to comparable annual government AI budgets. EU and France mobilization targets are shown in the table but held out of the scale (starred) so they don’t blow out the gradient.

lowhigh

Not in dataset

✱ Held out of scale (mobilization target)

Hover a highlighted country for detail. Countries outside the dataset are unshaded.

Reporting jurisdictions · 2025 government AI investment

Country	AI spend (2025)	Type	GDP	Population	AI $/capita	AI/GDP	GDP per AI$	Pop per AI$	Conf.

This functional services exchange is part of a research project identifying biases and developing an open source neuro symbolic world model. Vendors will price the cost of integrating the bias tests and citizen neuro symbolic world model as a line item in their quotes. The federal master aggregator requirements are complex. They are explained in this document:

“The system shall be built to harmonize with applicable federal AI risk management frameworks and standards as they mature, prioritizing auditability and human-in-the-loop oversight.”